November 4th, 2016By Naomi Klein The imperatives of the climate crisis and the logic of economic austerity are at war—and Washington State is on the front lines.So-called "revenue-neutral" carbon pricing—whereby the proceeds are used to fund tax cuts—has long been a cherished hobbyhorse of free-market economists and the odd Republican who favors climate action. It's also the policy of choice for big polluters like ExxonMobil. And now this right-wing friendly model is being pushed in Washington State, thanks to Initiative 732. Read on The Nation ...

04 November, 2016

September 21st, 2016By Naomi Klein In August 1976, The Nation published an essay that rocked the US political establishment, both for what it said and for who was saying it. "The 'Chicago Boys' in Chile: Economic 'Freedom's' Awful Toll" was written by Orlando Letelier, the former right-hand man of Chilean President Salvador Allende. Earlier in the decade, Allende had appointed Letelier to a series of top-level positions in his democratically elected socialist government: ambassador to the United States (where he negotiated the terms of nationalization for several US-owned firms operating in Chile), minister of foreign affairs, and, finally, minister of defense.Then, on September 11, 1973, Chile's government was overthrown in a bloody, CIA-backed coup led by General Augusto Pinochet. This shattering event left Allende dead in the smoldering presidential palace and Letelier and other "VIP prisoners" banished to a remote labor camp in the Strait
of Magellan. Read on The Nation ...

21 September, 2016

April 22nd, 2016By Naomi Klein Get ready for some high-powered hugging. On Friday, some 60 heads of state and government will gather at United Nations headquarters in New York City to officially sign the climate change pact known as the Paris Agreement.When it was unveiled in Paris last December, the headlines were euphoric. A "major leap for mankind," said one. Another declared that the pact marked the "end of the fossil fuel era."But there were dissenting voices, too: James Hansen, arguably the most respected climate scientist in the world, called the agreement "a fraud really, a fake," because "there is no action, just promises." And in Paris, thousands of climate activists took to the streets to protest a deal they said was so weak that it would lead to catastrophic levels of warming.So who's right? Is the Paris Agreement a historic political breakthrough or is it a potential ecological disaster? Read on Boston Globe ...

22 April, 2016

April 6th, 2016By Naomi Klein There aren't a lot of certainties left in the US presidential race, but here's one thing about which we can be absolutely sure: The Clinton camp really doesn't like talking about fossil-fuel money. Last week, when a young Greenpeace campaigner challenged Hillary Clinton about taking money from fossil-fuel companies, the candidate accused the Bernie Sanders campaign of "lying" and declared herself "so sick" of it. As the exchange went viral, a succession of high-powered Clinton supporters pronounced that there was nothing to see here and that everyone should move along. Read on The Nation ...

06 April, 2016

November 20th, 2015By Naomi Klein Whose security gets protected by any means necessary? Whose security is casually sacrificed, despite the means to do so much better? Those are the questions at the heart of the climate crisis, and the answers are the reason climate summits so often end in acrimony and tears.The French government's decision to ban protests, marches and other "outdoor activities" during the Paris climate summit is disturbing on many levels. The one that preoccupies me most has to do with the way it reflects the fundamental inequity of the climate crisis itself — and that core question of whose security is ultimately valued in our lopsided world. Read on The Guardian ...

20 November, 2015

November 18th, 2015By Jason Box and Naomi Klein Soon after the horrific terror attacks in Paris, last Friday, our phones filled with messages from friends and colleagues: "So are they going to cancel the Paris climate summit?" "The drums of war are beating. Count on climate change being drowned out." The assumption is reasonable enough. While many politicians pay lip service to the existential urgency of the climate crisis, as soon as another more immediate crisis rears its head—war, a market shock, an epidemic—climate reliably falls off the political map. Read on The New Yorker ...

18 November, 2015

October 24th, 2015By Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein Our inboxes runneth over with congratulations from American friends. "Pleasure to be able to look north without wincing," "we're all thrilled to have regained our sensible neighbors to the north," "Goodbye Stephen 'Keystone XL' Harper." And then there was this from England: "you now officially have the hottest Prime Minister EVER!"Like us, our friends tend to spend a lot of time thinking about climate change, so you can understand their euphoria. Among other crimes, Stephen Harper shredded environmental protections, re-fashioned our country as a petro-state, and made us climate criminals on the world stage. Now after the ugliest decade in recent Canadian memory, he is gone at last.So why are we not breathing more easily?Perhaps it's because of a few things we learned about our new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, during the election—details that didn't exactly make national news south of the border. Read on The Daily Beast ...

24 October, 2015

October 16th, 2015By Naomi Klein and Maude Barlow Ask Canadians about the most pressing issues facing their country and, alongside concerns about the economy and healthcare, they will inevitably raise the need for action on climate change. And no wonder: British Columbia and the Prairies were in the grips of a serious drought this summer and, only weeks after our election, world leaders will head to Paris to try to come up with a serious plan to stop global warming.Yet, encouraged by Conservative leader Stephen Harper, much of the election debate has been narrowed to focus on "wedge issues" such as cultural differences. But Canadians cannot afford to be pulled in by the politics of diversion and division.The reason is simple: when it comes to climate change, we are simply out of time. Climate scientists have told us that this is the most critical decade to begin decisively weaning ourselves off fossil fuels if we are to have a decent shot at preventing truly catastrophic warming. Read on The Guardian ...

16 October, 2015

August 28th, 2015By Naomi Klein For me, the road to This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate begins in a very specific time and place. The time was exactly ten years ago. The place was New Orleans, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The road in question was flooded and littered with bodies. Today I am posting, for the first time, the entire section on Hurricane Katrina from my last book, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Rereading the chapter 10 years after the events transpired, I am struck most by this fact: the same military equipment and contractors used against New Orleans' Black residents have since been used to militarize police across the United States, contributing to the epidemic of murders of unarmed Black men and women. That is one way in which the Disaster Capitalism Complex perpetuates itself and protects its lucrative market. This material is free for reproduction. From the Introduction: I met Jamar Perry in September 2005, at the big Red Cross shelter in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Dinner was being doled out by grinning young Scientologists, and he was standing in line. I had just been busted for talking to evacuees without a media escort and was now...

28 August, 2015

June 9th, 2015By Bill McKibben, Naomi Klein, and Annie Leonard Shell has one or two rivals for the title of Planet's Most Irresponsible Company, but it's definitely the most ironic.The grand irony, of course, is that, having watched the Arctic melt as global temperatures rose, Shell was first in line to drill the newly melted waters for yet more oil which would raise the temperature some more.But lately, the planetary-scale irony was compounded by one of a more local variety, contained in the phrase safety zone. Read on The Guardian ...

09 June, 2015